Case 3202158/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Natasha Edwards v Clacton Montessori Day Nursery and Preschool Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3202158/2024
- Decision date
- 29 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Knight Members
- Venue
- London East Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms J Clark, Dr L Rylah
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Natasha Edwards
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found Natasha Edwards's complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded and held that she had been unfairly dismissed by Clacton Montessori Day Nursery and Preschool Limited. It also upheld her complaint that she had been subjected to detriment for making protected disclosures.
The Tribunal further upheld Ms Edwards's complaint of direct disability discrimination. The written judgment records no remedy award or monetary breakdown and does not set out the factual findings or legal reasoning supporting these outcomes; it states that summary reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The upheld complaint was direct disability discrimination. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The upheld complaint concerned detriment for making protected disclosures. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.