Case 3202169/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Conran v Ghyllgrove Community Assocation Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3202169/2023
- Decision date
- 7 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Malik
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Conran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs E Conran presented claims of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and sex against Ghyllgrove Community Association Limited. The respondent did not submit a response by the stated deadline and did not attend the hearing on 29 April 2024. Employment Judge Malik, sitting alone, was satisfied that default judgment should be entered under Rule 21(2) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that both the sexual orientation discrimination claim and the sex discrimination claim succeed. No remedy was determined at this stage, because the tribunal directed that a further hearing would be listed to deal with remedy and that a separate case management order would be issued.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Default judgment entered because the respondent did not submit a response or attend the hearing. | Upheld | Sexual orientation | — |
| Sex discrimination | Default judgment entered because the respondent did not submit a response or attend the hearing. | Upheld | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.