Case 3202194/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Fulbahar Ruf Begum v Ministry of Justice — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202194/2019
- Decision date
- 13 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Fulbahar Ruf Begum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination on 19 September 2019, after her employment had ended by resignation on 31 October 2018. She said she had sought adjustments because of a learning disability, had been harassed after doing so, and had relied on advice from her trade union representative about the internal grievance process and tribunal time limits.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal held that the claimant's case was that her adviser had given mistaken advice. Applying the reasonably practicable test and case law on advice from skilled advisers, the tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable to bring the claim in time and dismissed it as out of time.
For disability discrimination, the tribunal considered whether it was just and equitable to extend time, including the section 33 Limitation Act factors. It took the claimant's case at its highest, including the delayed grievance process and her reliance on union advice, but found those matters were not sufficient to justify extending time, particularly given the length of delay and the likely importance of oral evidence about stale allegations. All claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed as out of time. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the unfair dismissal claim within the three-month time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed as out of time. The judgment refers to disability discrimination allegations including reasonable adjustments and harassment/bullying; the tribunal declined to extend time on just and equitable grounds. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- reasonably practicable test
- just and equitable test
- section 33 Limitation Act 1980 factors
- Dedman v British Building & Engineering Appliances Ltd
- Paczkowski v Sieradska
- Apegun-Gabriels v Lambeth LBC
- British Coal v Keeble
- Robertson v Bexley Community Service
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.