Case 3202199/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Jain v Clearwin Ltd (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3202199/2019
- Decision date
- 31 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Jain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Miss R Jain's claim against Clearwin Ltd (In Administration) was struck out. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal noted that by a letter dated 24 October 2020 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out on that basis. No substantive determination of the underlying breach of contract or unlawful deduction from wages allegations appears in the judgment text provided.
The judgment was signed by Employment Judge Burgher on 31 August 2022. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 24 October 2020, to make representations or request a hearing on whether it should be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 24 October 2020, to make representations or request a hearing on whether it should be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.