Case 3202202/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Pannell v Canna CBD Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202202/2020
- Decision date
- 15 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodrich Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Pannell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs N Pannell succeeded on two separate monetary claims against Canna CBD Limited. The tribunal found that she had been dismissed with less notice than she was entitled to, and it ordered the respondent to pay damages of £613.87. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday pay entitlement.
For the holiday pay claim, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,846.15. The judgment does not record any reduction, separate statutory uplift, or interest, and it does not identify any discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other claims beyond the notice and holiday pay issues.
The total sums ordered by the tribunal were therefore £613.87 and £1,846.15, making a combined award of £2,460.02.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed with less notice than she was entitled to and awarded damages for that notice shortfall. | Upheld | — | £614 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday pay entitlement and ordered payment of that sum. | Upheld | — | £1,846 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,460
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.