Case 3202202/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Julie Young v Park View Services (Barking) Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3202202/2024
- Decision date
- 23 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bann Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Julie Young
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 after the respondent did not enter a response. Employment Judge J Bann decided the matter could properly be determined without a hearing of evidence from the respondent, who did not attend. The claimant appeared in person at the East London Hearing Centre via CVP on 23 June 2025.
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded for the period 1 October 2024 to 6 November 2024, and ordered the respondent to pay £1,679.76 net. The tribunal also found that the respondent had breached the claimant's contract of employment by failing to pay her full monthly salary for July 2024, which remained outstanding on termination, and awarded £73.44 in damages, payable net.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment under s.135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, calculated in accordance with s.163. The claim was well-founded and the respondent was ordered to pay £7,350 as the statutory redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Net sum awarded for unauthorised deduction from wages in the period 1 October 2024 to 6 November 2024. | Upheld | — | £1,680 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for failure to pay full monthly salary for July 2024; sum paid net. | Upheld | — | £73 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment under s.135 and calculated per s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £7,350 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,103
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
- s.135 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.