Case 3202205/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Loimon v Dog Services UK Limited (t/a Fetch & Retrieve) (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3202205/2024
- Decision date
- 9 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Loimon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at East London Hearing Centre by video on 9 December 2025 before Employment Judge Park, considered four claims brought by Miss A Loimon against Dog Services UK Limited (t/a Fetch & Retrieve), which is in voluntary liquidation. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend.
The tribunal found that the claimant's claims for direct discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 and for discrimination arising from a disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010 were both well founded and succeeded. The claims for victimisation under section 27 and for failure to make reasonable adjustments under section 21 of the same Act were found not well founded and were dismissed.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £13,694.76 by way of compensation, comprising £6,694.76 in respect of financial losses and £7,000 in respect of injury to feelings. The document provided is the rule 61 judgment only; written reasons were not provided unless requested, so the underlying factual findings and reasoning are not set out in the text extracted.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010. Well founded and succeeds. The judgment awards a single compensation sum of £13,694.76 for the successful claims without splitting the award between section 13 and section 15. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from a disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010. Well founded and succeeds. Compensation is awarded jointly with the section 13 claim and not split per claim in the judgment. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under section 21 Equality Act 2010. Not well founded; dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation under section 27 Equality Act 2010. Not well founded; dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,695
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £6,695
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- section 21 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.