Case 3202213/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Freeman v Ukforex Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3202213/2023
- Decision date
- 21 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Freeman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London East Employment Tribunals on 27 November 2023. The respondents failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondents had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The claim therefore succeeded.
The judgment did not record any remedy figure. It stated that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled would be determined at a separate Remedy Hearing, and that the parties would be notified of the hearing date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment on the papers under rule 21. The tribunal found that the respondents had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. Remedy was to be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.