Case 3202245/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R. Rampersad v Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202245/2019
- Decision date
- 18 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R. Rampersad
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R. Rampersad presented his ET1 on 24 September 2019 after ACAS early conciliation between 21 and 23 September 2019. The ET1 complained of unfair dismissal, race discrimination and disability discrimination, but this judgment dealt only with whether the tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the unfair-dismissal claim.
The tribunal found that the effective date of termination was 13 February 2019. It relied on the dismissal meeting and the follow-up letter stating that his last day of employment would be 13 February 2019, together with the claimant's own and his union's contemporaneous emails, the ill-health retirement paperwork, and the final payslip showing £8,433.12 marked as pay in lieu of notice and £2,811.05 marked as pay in lieu of annual leave. The tribunal rejected the claimant's argument that the effective date was 31 May 2019 or 27 August 2019, and held that the dismissal letter was not ambiguous so there was no need to apply contra proferentem.
On that basis, the three-month limitation period expired on 12 May 2019, so the claim was about four and a half months late. The tribunal held that it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time: by late February 2019 the claimant and his union were discussing legal advice and the prospects of a tribunal claim, and the tribunal found that he chose not to issue proceedings after being told the claim was unlikely to succeed. His ill-health and the length of the internal appeal process did not justify an extension of time. The unfair-dismissal claim was therefore struck out for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal determined only the unfair-dismissal time-limit/jurisdiction issue in this judgment. The ET1 also referred to race and disability discrimination, but those claims were not adjudicated here. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.97 ERA 1996
- s.111 ERA 1996
- Stapp v Shaftesbury Society
- Adams v GKN Sankey Ltd
- Lee v Ariston Domestic Appliances Ltd
- McCabe v Greater Glasgow Health Board
- Palmer v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- Walls Meat Co Ltd v Khan
- Norbert Dentressangle Logistics Ltd v Hutton
- Schultz v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.