Case 3202247/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Dobson v Learning Disability Experience (LDX) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202247/2015
- Decision date
- 6 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Dobson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal in Miss L Dobson v Learning Disability Experience (LDX) struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment records that by a letter dated 04/06/2018 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not contain any determination of the underlying merits of the claim or any award of remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. A letter dated 04/06/2018 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but she made no representations in writing, or none sufficient, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.