Case 3202254/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr MJ Rajput v London Borough of Hackney — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202254/2019
- Decision date
- 23 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs G Forrest, Mrs BK Saund
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr MJ Rajput
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a dismissal judgment following withdrawal. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal.
The extracted judgment text does not set out factual findings, legal reasoning, or any determination on the merits of the pleaded claims. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The dismissal judgment states only that the claimant's claims were 'dismissed on withdrawal'. The presence of an unfair dismissal claim is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories and Layer 1 context, not expressly itemised in the extracted judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The dismissal judgment states only that the claimant's claims were 'dismissed on withdrawal'. The presence of a disability discrimination claim is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories and Layer 1 context, not expressly itemised in the extracted judgment text. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.