Case 3202255/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Cole v Den Automation Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202255/2019
- Decision date
- 10 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Cole
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Den Automation Limited made unauthorised deductions from Mr J Cole’s wages. The judgment recorded that he started work on 5 June 2017, that his last working day was 31 July 2019, and that he was contractually entitled to monthly net pay of £3,228.80. It found that he worked his contracted hours in June 2019 but was paid only £1,254.31, and that he worked his contracted hours in July 2019 but was not paid at all.
The tribunal also noted HMRC records showing tax and National Insurance payments by the respondent for the claimant’s pay in June and July 2019. It recorded that the claimant had not received a dismissal letter or been told he was being made redundant, but said notice pay and redundancy pay were not part of the pleaded claim before it. Judgment was entered for unauthorised deductions in the sums of £1,974.49 for June 2019 and £3,228.80 for July 2019, making a total award of £5,203.29.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,203 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,203
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.