Case 3202277/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z Karim v Real Restaurants Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202277/2019
- Decision date
- 13 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Z Karim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 13 January 2021 before Employment Judge Russell. The judgment records that neither party attended and neither party requested a postponement.
The only substantive outcome recorded in the extracted text is that all claims were dismissed. The judgment does not set out separate findings of fact, legal reasoning, or any remedy award in the extracted text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim type inferred from the GOV.UK case listing category; the extracted judgment text itself only states that all claims are dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Claim type inferred from the GOV.UK case listing category; the extracted judgment text itself only states that all claims are dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim type inferred from the GOV.UK case listing category; the extracted judgment text itself only states that all claims are dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.