Case 3202283/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C. Haseman v Hanover Public House Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202283/2020
- Decision date
- 19 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C. Haseman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr C. Haseman was an employee of Hanover Public House Ltd. It held that, contrary to Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, read with Regulation 30(1)(b), the respondent failed on termination of employment to pay the claimant the full amount due in respect of accrued but untaken holiday.
The respondent did not appear and was not represented. The tribunal ordered payment of £320 for the 2019/2020 leave year and £36.80 for the 2020/2021 leave year. The sums were ordered to be paid gross, with the claimant to account to HMRC as appropriate. No other claim or remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed on termination to pay the full amount due for accrued but untaken holiday. It ordered £320 for the 2019/2020 leave year and £36.80 for the 2020/2021 leave year, payable gross. | Upheld | — | £357 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £357
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 30(1)(b) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.