Case 3202291/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Semla v Unisystem Freight UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202291/2019
- Decision date
- 8 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Speker OBE
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Semla
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 17 February 2020 at the East London Hearing Centre, before Employment Judge Speker OBE DL, the claimant was in person and the respondent was represented by Mr R Collins, its director. The judgment records that the claims of unfair dismissal, race discrimination, breach of contract and unauthorised deduction of pay were dismissed because the claimant withdrew them.
The respondent's counterclaim in relation to overpayment of annual leave was also dismissed because the respondent withdrew it. No findings on the substantive merits of any claim or counterclaim are set out in the judgment.
The hearing listed for 7 and 8 January 2021 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Respondent's counterclaim in relation to overpayment of annual leave was dismissed on withdrawal by the Respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.