Case 3202313/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Sanchex Iza v Kristal Contracts Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202313/2019
- Decision date
- 5 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Sanchex Iza
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs R Sanchex Iza worked as a cleaner for Kristal Contracts Limited from 2 June 2014 until her dismissal on 9 July 2019. She brought claims for unfair dismissal and unpaid notice pay. The respondent did not comply with Tribunal orders dated 6 November 2019 and 8 February 2020 concerning disclosure and the hearing bundle, and the Tribunal struck out the response under rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013.
At the hearing the claimant had limited English and no court-authorised interpreter was present. The Tribunal considered the matter on an uncontested basis under rule 37(3) and rule 21 after giving the parties an opportunity to resolve matters. The respondent said there had been no time for any investigation before dismissal and did not dispute that no dismissal meeting or appeal had been offered. The judge said a procedural unfair dismissal finding would have been highly likely had the respondent been allowed to participate.
On remedy, the Tribunal found average gross monthly pay of £457.16 and weekly gross pay of £105.50, with net monthly pay of £440.72 and weekly net pay of £101.70. It awarded £119.59 for the notice pay shortfall in July 2019, a basic award of £527.50 for five full years' service, and a compensatory award of £461.16 made up of £161.16 loss of earnings and £300 for loss of statutory rights. The Tribunal then applied a 25% uplift of £277.06 for the respondent's total failure to comply with the ACAS Code on disciplinary and dismissal, resulting in a total award of £1,385.31.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal struck out the respondent's response for non-compliance with orders dated 6 November 2019 and 8 February 2020, then found the unfair dismissal claim succeeded on an uncontested basis. The award for this claim comprised a basic award of £527.50 and a compensatory award of £461.16 before the separate 25% uplift was applied to the combined total with notice pay. | Upheld | — | £989 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as unpaid notice pay and awards a shortfall of £119.59 for July 2019. | Upheld | — | £120 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,385
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £528
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £461
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- rule 37(1)(c) ET Rules 2013
- rule 2 overriding objective
- rule 37(3) ET Rules 2013
- rule 21 ET Rules 2013
- ACAS Code on disciplinary and dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.