Case 3202344/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Angela Hinson v Aveley Lodge Care Homes Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3202344/2023
- Decision date
- 9 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barrett Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Angela Hinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Angela Hinson brought a claim against Aveley Lodge Care Homes Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages. The case was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 9 April 2024 by CVP before Employment Judge Barrett. Mrs Hinson represented herself with assistance from her husband, and the Respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The Tribunal dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction. It held that the claim had not been presented within the time limitation provisions in section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No further substantive findings on the alleged deductions were recorded in the written judgment.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the Tribunal's note. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the claim was not presented within the time limitation provisions at section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.