Case 3202357/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Tunstall v Blue Co London LLP (In Administration) and 7 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202357/2018
- Decision date
- 27 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Date
Parties
9 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Russell Date recorded that all claims against all respondents were dismissed upon a withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on liability for the unfair dismissal or discrimination complaints, and it records no monetary award.
The same judgment refused the Sixth Respondent’s application for reconsideration of the orders sent to the parties on 27 April 2020. The tribunal said it was not necessary in the interests of justice to review the earlier order refusing his application to amend his response to plead a defence under section 110(3) Equality Act 2010, because all claims against him had already been dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; the judgment records that all claims against all respondents were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination is recorded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination is recorded. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits determination is recorded. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 70(2) of The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.