Case 3202358/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Mukeba v Tad Recruitment Limited trading as We Staff — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202358/2020
- Decision date
- 1 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge F McLaren Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Mukeba
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Mukeba brought a complaint against Tad Recruitment Limited trading as We Staff. The case was heard by Employment Judge F McLaren at East London Hearing Centre on 1 February 2021, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not attending.
The tribunal upheld the complaint that the employer had made a deduction from wages contrary to section 13. It made a declaration to that effect and found that the amount due was unpaid holiday pay for 2.8 weeks of accrued but untaken leave.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,232, less PAYE as appropriate. That sum was calculated using a weekly gross pay of £440. No further remedy components were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages contrary to section 13 and ordered payment of unpaid holiday pay for 2.8 weeks accrued but untaken leave, calculated from a weekly gross pay of £440. | Upheld | — | £1,232 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,232
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.