Case 3202359/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Shah v G4S Cash Solutions (UK) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202359/2020
- Decision date
- 13 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Shah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant did not attend the open preliminary hearing. The Respondent was represented by senior counsel, and the hearing proceeded remotely by Cloud Video Platform.
The Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the Claimant's claim for a redundancy payment because he was employed at the date of the complaint, 7 September 2020. The redundancy payment claim was therefore dismissed.
The Claimant's application to amend his claim to add complaints of unfair redundancy process and unlawful deduction was refused. The Tribunal recorded that the details of those proposed claims were unspecified, the Claimant was not present to clarify them, and the application appeared to have been made more than three months after his resignation in February or March 2021, meaning such claims would likely be out of time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to consider the redundancy payment claim because the Claimant was employed at the date of the complaint, 7 September 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.