Case 3202368/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3202368/2018
- Decision date
- 23 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 10 April 2019 before Regional Employment Judge Taylor, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's public interest disclosure detriment claims. It held that those claims had been presented out of time and dismissed them.
The tribunal also granted the claimant's application to amend the claim form so as to add two complaints of post-termination detriment, both dated 7 February 2019. Those amended complaints were allowed to proceed to a final hearing and were not finally determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal held the claimant's public interest disclosure detriment claims were presented out of time and dismissed them at a preliminary hearing. The amendment application to add two complaints of post-termination detriment dated 7 February 2019 was granted and those complaints were left to proceed to a final hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.