Case 3202390/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Egbujie v Mid and South East Essex NHS Foundation Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202390/2020
- Decision date
- 22 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Brien Members
- Panel members
- Ms S Harwood, Ms A Berry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Egbujie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre by Cloud Video Platform on 20, 21 and 22 April 2021 before Employment Judge O’Brien, with Ms S Harwood and Ms A Berry sitting as members. The claimant was Mrs B Egbujie and the respondent was Mid and South East Essex NHS Foundation Trust.
The tribunal’s judgment records that the claimant’s complaints of direct discrimination on the grounds of sex and/or race failed and were dismissed. It also records that her victimisation complaint failed and was dismissed. The judgment does not set out separate findings or reasons for each complaint in the extracted text provided.
No monetary remedy is recorded in the judgment extract, and no award is stated. The outcome is limited to dismissal of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant’s complaints of direct discrimination on the grounds of sex and/or race failed and were dismissed; it does not separate the reasoning for sex and race. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant’s complaints of direct discrimination on the grounds of sex and/or race failed and were dismissed; it does not separate the reasoning for sex and race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the claimant’s victimisation complaint failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.