Case 3202406/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P O Williams-Falokun v 1) Barts Health NHS Trust 2) Irma Molouba 3) Helen Olaniyi 4) Sofura Sheikh 5) Jackie Rajalingham 6) Louise Palmer RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 3202406/2023
- Decision date
- 25 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Representatives
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P O Williams-Falokun
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing on 25 November 2025 and had not contacted the Tribunal or the respondent in response to the strike-out warning letter and notice of hearing.
Employment Judge Jones found that the claimant had not complied with Tribunal orders, had not actively pursued the claim, and had failed to cooperate in preparation for the hearing. The claim was struck out under Rule 38(1)(c) and Rule 38(1)(e) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, with the listed hearing dates confirmed as vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment is a short preliminary hearing strike-out order and does not set out the pleaded allegations. Claim type is taken from the provided listing category and hint. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 38(1)(c) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 38(1)(e) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 3 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.