Case 3202420/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R James v Clean Green Cleaning Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202420/2019
- Decision date
- 16 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R James
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr R James's claims against Clean Green Cleaning Services Limited were dismissed following non-compliance with an Unless Order dated 23 October 2020. The extracted text does not set out any separate merits findings on the underlying claims.
No monetary remedy is recorded in the extracted text, and the decision is limited to dismissal of the claims for procedural non-compliance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment text itself states that the claimant's claims were dismissed following non-compliance with the Unless Order dated 23 October 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment text itself states that the claimant's claims were dismissed following non-compliance with the Unless Order dated 23 October 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.