Case 3202422/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Fella v 1) Tony Manconi 2) Venerdi Ltd 3) Una Bella Vita Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202422/2020
- Decision date
- 17 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Brien Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Fella
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr R Fella had suffered an underpayment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday. It described the claim as one for unauthorised deductions of wages and/or damages for breach of contract.
The judgment records that the second and third respondents conceded liability for £660.95 net of tax. In addition, the tribunal ordered those respondents, jointly and severally, to pay a further £213.10 gross of tax to the claimant.
No discrimination, dismissal, or other remedy issue was determined in the judgment. The only monetary outcome recorded was the holiday underpayment sum of £874.05 in total.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the claimant had suffered an underpayment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday, described as unauthorised deductions of wages and/or damages for breach of contract. The second and third respondents conceded £660.95 net and were ordered to pay a further £213.10 gross. | Upheld | — | £874 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £874
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.