Case 3202429/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Kim Holman Lauren Gardiner v Ambulance Transfers Ltd Joseph Church — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202429/2019
- Decision date
- 14 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Members
- Panel members
- Mr P Quinn, Ms A Berry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Kim Holman Lauren Gardiner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningHeard at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 27 to 30 April 2021 before Employment Judge Jones, with lay members Mr P Quinn and Ms A Berry, the tribunal recorded that Kim Holman and Lauren Gardiner succeeded in complaints of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and on the grounds of age against both respondents, Ambulance Transfers Ltd and Joseph Church.
The remedy section states that interest was awarded under the Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996 at 8%. Ms Holman was awarded two months' loss of wages of £3,000, injury to feelings of £20,000, interest on wages of £986.30, and interest on injury to feelings of £3,335.89, making a total of £27,322.19. Ms Gardiner was awarded three months' loss of wages of £4,500, injury to feelings of £20,000, interest on wages of £2,219.17, and interest on injury to feelings of £3,335.89, making a total of £30,055.06. The respondents were ordered to pay those sums forthwith, for a combined total of £57,377.25.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Complaint succeeded against both respondents. The judgment does not split the monetary awards by individual claim. | Upheld | Sexual orientation | — |
| Age discrimination | Complaint succeeded against both respondents. The judgment does not split the monetary awards by individual claim. | Upheld | Age | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £57,377
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £7,500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.