Case 3202440/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D White v Adams Leisure Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202440/2019
- Decision date
- 10 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at East London Hearing Centre before Employment Judge Russell on 10 May 2021, found in favour of Mr D White on all claims recorded in the judgment. The respondent did not attend. The judgment awarded sums for unauthorised deductions from wages, breach of contract, unfair dismissal, and unpaid holiday entitlement.
On wages, the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction and ordered payment of £92.05 for sick pay and £211.51 for unpaid tips. On notice, it found the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract because he was not given his full four weeks' notice, and awarded £75.38 in damages.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal held the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £753.85, recording two years' completed service. It made no compensatory award because the claimant mitigated his losses. On holiday pay, the tribunal found that at termination the claimant had accrued 19 days' holiday, had taken 13 days, and was owed £311.31 for 6 days' holiday less £140.97 already paid.
The tribunal recorded a total award of £1,444.10. No separate remedy for interest or injury to feelings was set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for sick pay (£92.05) and unpaid tips (£211.51). | Upheld | — | £304 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract because he was not given his full four weeks' notice. | Upheld | — | £75 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair and awarded a basic award of £753.85 based on two years' completed service. It made no compensatory award because the claimant mitigated his losses. | Upheld | — | £754 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found holiday entitlement remained unpaid at termination. It recorded 19 days accrued holiday, 13 days taken, and ordered payment of £311.31 for 6 days less £140.97 already paid. | Upheld | — | £311 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,444
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £754
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.