Case 3202442/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss I Andrijauskaite v Harvest Artisan Bakery Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202442/2019
- Decision date
- 9 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lewis Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss I Andrijauskaite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss I Andrijauskaite’s claims succeeded in full. Employment Judge Lewis recorded that Harvest Artisan Bakery Limited had not entered a response and did not attend the hearing on 9 March 2020. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £1,187.32.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £380.00. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £329.33, subject to any lawful deductions for tax and national insurance.
The judgment does not record any discrimination or other statutory compensation findings. The total of the monetary awards is £1,896.65.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,187 |
| Breach of contract | Award was described as damages in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £380 |
| Holiday pay | Award stated to be subject to any lawful deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £329 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,897
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £380
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.