Case 3202456/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Williams v ABP (London) Investment Limited and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202456/2020
- Decision date
- 11 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Representation
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr S Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 27 October 2020, Employment Judge McLaren granted the claimant’s application for interim relief. The order was made under s130 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 after the respondent was not willing to reinstate or re-engage the claimant pending determination or settlement of the complaint, so the contract of employment was ordered to remain in force for the purposes set out in s130(1)(a) and (b).
The order required the respondent, from the date of termination until the complaint is determined or settled, to pay the claimant £13,750 gross per month, less appropriate tax deductions, on the same pay date as other employees, usually the last Thursday of each month. It also required a pension contribution equal to 10% of the claimant’s monthly gross pay and continuation of private health insurance on the same terms as before termination.
The tribunal further ordered the respondent to pay arrears of pay accrued from termination to the date of first payment under the order by 26 November 2020. The extracted judgment records only the interim relief application and does not determine the underlying substantive complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Interim relief application succeeded. The order required the respondent to pay £13,750 gross per month (less appropriate tax deductions) pending determination or settlement of the complaint; this was an interim relief order under s130 ERA 1996 rather than a final damages award. | Upheld | — | £13,750 |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s130 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.