Case 3202458/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Terry Marsh v The Business Supply Network Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202458/2019
- Decision date
- 9 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Terry Marsh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Terry Marsh did not attend the hearing. The judge telephoned him at the start; he said he believed someone had told him he did not need to attend because the case would be decided on the papers. The tribunal noted that he had filed only the claim form and no witness statement, documents, or calculation for the holiday pay claimed, and it proceeded in his absence.
Richard Willson, the respondent's managing director, gave sworn evidence which the tribunal accepted as truthful. He said the business had suffered from higher costs and reduced orders, and that on 8 July 2019 he told the claimant and another employee that they would have to be given notice in the future as part of staffing reductions.
The tribunal found that when told he would be given notice of termination by reason of redundancy, the claimant said there was no point in staying and walked out, not returning. On that basis, the tribunal held that he resigned with immediate effect rather than being dismissed by the respondent. The claim for notice pay therefore failed.
On holiday pay, the tribunal accepted the respondent's evidence that it had worked out from its records how much holiday the claimant had accrued and had paid him for holiday not taken, including 3 days' holiday pay. The tribunal rejected the holiday-pay claim and dismissed all claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant said he was owed notice pay after being told he would be given notice in the future. The tribunal found that he resigned with immediate effect on 8 July 2019 and was not dismissed, so he was not entitled to notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant said he was owed holiday pay and had no calculation or supporting documents. The tribunal accepted the respondent's evidence that it had calculated and paid the accrued untaken holiday due, including 3 days' holiday pay, so the claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.