Case 3202464/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Mayanja v Praxis Community Project — 2019
- Case reference
- 3202464/2018
- Decision date
- 29 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms S Campbell, Mr M L Wood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Mayanja
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Mayanja did not attend the final hearing at East London Hearing Centre on 7 November 2019. The tribunal noted that he had been told the time and place of the hearing, had queried whether the case had been transferred to Manchester, and had already been served with the case management order refusing that application. The tribunal decided under rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 to proceed in his absence and considered his witness statement together with evidence from the Respondent's witnesses.
After doing so, the tribunal dismissed the Claimant's claims under the Equality Act 2010. The judgment does not break down separate reasons for each protected characteristic, but the official listing identifies the case as involving race and sex discrimination claims. No compensatory or injury-to-feelings award was made to the Claimant.
On the Respondent's application for costs, the tribunal found that the Claimant had conducted the proceedings unreasonably by continuing with a claim that had no reasonable prospects of success after being served with all of the Respondent's evidence and being warned that costs would be sought if he continued. The tribunal also found that he had deliberately or recklessly failed to attend the final hearing.
The Claimant was ordered to pay the Respondent £1,009.90 in solicitor's costs and £850 in Counsel's fees, making a total costs order of £1,859.90.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment dismisses the Equality Act 2010 claims without separating the reasoning by protected characteristic; this claim type follows the official listing category. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment dismisses the Equality Act 2010 claims without separating the reasoning by protected characteristic; this claim type follows the official listing category. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,860
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.