Case 3202475/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z Bye v Housechoice Limited Held at: East London Hearing Centre (by CVP) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3202475/2023
- Decision date
- 15 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Povey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Z Bye
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Z Bye brought a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages against Housechoice Limited. The hearing took place on 15 April 2024 at East London Hearing Centre by CVP, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance for the respondent.
Employment Judge S Povey found that the claim of unauthorised deductions from wages was made out. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £431.43 in respect of unpaid wages.
The reasons are not set out in detail in the extracted text. The judgment records a calculation for wages for the period 15/10/23 to 14/11/23 at £431.53, which does not exactly match the final figure ordered, so the text contains a minor numerical inconsistency.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of unauthorised deductions from wages is made out and orders payment of £431.43. The calculation line beneath it refers to wages for 15/10/23 to 14/11/23 as £431.53, so the extracted text contains a small internal inconsistency. | Upheld | — | £431 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £431
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.