Case 3202477/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Jurgaityte v City & Essex Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202477/2018
- Decision date
- 9 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Jurgaityte
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs J Jurgaityte succeeded in her complaint of unfair dismissal against City and Essex Limited. The remedy judgment records that her employment ran from 20 May 2014 to 31 October 2018, that her gross weekly pay was £408 and net weekly pay £333.84, and that the respondent contributed 2% of gross pay to her pension.
Employment Judge Jones calculated a basic award of five weeks’ wages by applying the age-related weeks formula stated in the judgment: three years under age 41 at one week’s wages and two years over age 41 at 1.5 weeks’ wages. That produced £2,040 for wages plus £129.20 for pension, giving a basic award of £2,169.20. The compensatory award was calculated on six months’ loss of wages at £8,679.84 plus six months’ pension contributions of £155.04, giving £8,834.88 before reduction.
The tribunal then applied a 10% reduction under section 124A Employment Rights Act 1996, reducing that figure to £7,951.40, and added £350 for loss of statutory rights. The total sum ordered payable to the claimant was £10,470.60.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £10,471 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,471
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,169
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,951
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 124A Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.