Case 3202480/2023 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr Kevin Watson (2) Mr Steve Cross v CWNetworks Limited – in liquidation and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3202480/2023
- Decision date
- 17 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Comfort
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Mr Kevin Watson (2) Mr Steve Cross
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimants were not employees of CWNetworks Limited for the purposes of section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claimants' claims. No monetary remedy was awarded or itemised in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimants were not employees of CWNetworks Limited for the purposes of section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that the claimants' claims are dismissed; it does not separately set out reasoning for this claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimants were not employees of CWNetworks Limited for the purposes of section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that the claimants' claims are dismissed; it does not separately set out reasoning for this claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimants were not employees of CWNetworks Limited for the purposes of section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that the claimants' claims are dismissed; it does not separately set out reasoning for this claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claimants were not employees of CWNetworks Limited for the purposes of section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that the claimants' claims are dismissed; it does not separately set out reasoning for this claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.