Case 3202492/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Tengue v Interserve Security (First)Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3202492/2018
- Decision date
- 9 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Tengue
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 9 August 2019, Employment Judge Crosfill recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment contains no substantive findings on liability, no analysis of the underlying facts, and no merits decision on the listed race discrimination and unfair dismissal issues.
No remedy was awarded because the case ended on withdrawal. The text does not set out any split between individual heads of claim or any further procedural directions beyond dismissal of the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not separately explain the withdrawn heads of claim, so this entry reflects the race discrimination listing category in the case context. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not separately explain the withdrawn heads of claim, so this entry reflects the unfair dismissal listing category in the case context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.