Case 3202497/2023 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Stephen Linnecar (2) Claire Linnecar v Creative Kingdom Books Ltd - in Liquidation and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3202497/2023
- Decision date
- 7 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Stephen Linnecar (2) Claire Linnecar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants, Stephen and Claire Linnecar, sought payments from the National Insurance Fund after Creative Kingdom Books Ltd went into voluntary liquidation on 21 September 2023. The sole issue before Employment Judge J S Burns was whether they were employees of the company when it entered liquidation. The tribunal dismissed the claims against both respondents.
The tribunal found that the company was set up by C1 in 2011, that the claimants were husband and wife, and that they were registered as directors and shareholders. It accepted that offer letters were issued in 2011 on the basis of £12,500 annual salaries for stated weekly hours, but found those figures had been chosen for tax-avoidance reasons and did not correspond to the actual working arrangements. The claimed reduction in C1's hours from 37.5 to 22 hours a week from 1 April 2020 was given little weight, no reliable record of actual hours was produced, the bank statements did not show a regular salary pattern, and the claimants' own case showed long periods with no salary payments.
Applying section 230 ERA 1996 and the authorities in Ready Mixed Concrete, Autoclenz, Eaton, Rajah and Neufeld and Howe, the tribunal held that there was no mutuality of obligation, no sufficient control and no genuine contract of employment. It found the written offer letters did not reflect how the parties actually conducted themselves and described the purported contracts as a sham. On that basis, neither claimant proved employee status, so the First Respondent was not liable to pay salary, holidays, notice pay or redundancy pay, and the Second Respondent was not liable to make any payment from the Fund.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the tribunal found the claimants were not employees of the First Respondent; no liability was established for notice pay or other contractual sums. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed on the tribunal's finding that neither claimant had proved employee status at the date of liquidation. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed; the tribunal found the stated salary figures were chosen for tax reasons and did not reflect a genuine wage arrangement. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed; the tribunal referred to claims for holidays/paid holidays but found no employee status and therefore no entitlement. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 230 ERA 1996
- Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance
- Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher
- Eaton v Robert Eaton Ltd
- Rajah v Secretary of State
- Secretary of State v Neufeld and Howe
- mutuality of obligation, control and personal service
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.