Case 3202500/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Towers v CO Bathrooms Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202500/2019
- Decision date
- 23 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Towers
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Russell Date found that CO Bathrooms Limited (in creditors' voluntary liquidation) had failed to pay Miss B Towers sums contractually due for notice pay, sick pay for August 2019, pay for hours worked on 28 August 2019, and commission and balance of bonus for 2017/18. Those items were awarded in full as a breach of contract claim, totalling 3,705.69.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages of 330.35 in the August 2019 payslip, being a 1,500 deduction offset by a 1,169.65 overpayment in July 2019. It further found that 12.5 days of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement remained unpaid on termination and ordered payment of 1,442.25. The total sum ordered to be paid to the claimant was 5,478.29.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay contractually due notice pay, sick pay, hours worked, commission and balance of bonus. | Upheld | — | £3,706 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from the August 2019 payslip, calculated as a deduction of 1,500 less a July 2019 overpayment of 1,169.65. | Upheld | — | £330 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had not paid 12.5 days of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement on termination. | Upheld | — | £1,442 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,478
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.