Case 3202513/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Oguntimehin v London Borough of Newham and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 3202513/2018
- Decision date
- 4 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs M Oguntimehin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing, the Claimant withdrew the claims brought against Liquid Personnel Limited and Adecco UK Limited in Case Number 3202592/2018. The Tribunal dismissed those claims upon withdrawal and removed those respondents from the proceedings.
No merits findings were made in relation to the remaining claim against London Borough of Newham. The Tribunal ordered the Claimant and London Borough of Newham to try to agree the issues in that claim by 30 September 2019, or otherwise ask for a closed preliminary hearing to determine the issues for final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the Claimant withdrew her claims against Liquid Personnel Limited and Adecco UK Limited in Case Number 3202592/2018, and those claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The specific claim types are not identified in the judgment text. No substantive claim against London Borough of Newham in Case Number 3202513/2018 was determined in this judgment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.