Case 3202513/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Miss Stokes v Lucy Gray Limited — 2024

Case reference: 3202513/2023
Decision date: 19 June 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Iman Representation

Indexed: 17 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss Stokes

Respondent

Lucy Gray Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Iman, sitting alone at the East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 12 June 2024, considered a complaint of unlawful deduction of wages brought by Miss Stokes against Lucy Gray Limited. The claimant represented herself; the respondent did not attend.

The tribunal found the complaint of unlawful deduction of wages well founded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £6,690.74, being the gross sum deducted. That sum was composed of 12 weeks' notice pay of £6,460.62 and 3 days' salary of £230.12. The judgment records that the respondent is responsible for deducting and paying any tax or national insurance at source.

The judgment text supplied addresses only the unlawful deduction of wages claim; no determination on the other gov.uk-listed categories (breach of contract, unfair dismissal) appears within this document.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Judgment records the complaint of unlawful deduction of wages as well founded; sum comprises 12 weeks' notice pay (£6,460.62) and 3 days' salary (£230.12). Respondent did not attend.	Upheld	—	£6,691
Breach of contract	Listed on gov.uk under Breach of Contract, but the judgment text provided addresses only the unlawful deduction of wages claim and does not separately adjudicate a breach of contract claim. Unclear from the available text whether a distinct breach of contract claim was determined.	Other	—	—
Unfair dismissal	Listed on gov.uk under Unfair Dismissal, but the judgment text provided does not contain any adjudication of an unfair dismissal claim. Unclear from the available text whether this claim was determined, withdrawn, or addressed in a separate judgment.	Other	—	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £6,691; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.