Case 3202515/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Rashid Qadeer v Mushtaq Ahmad — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202515/2019
- Decision date
- 2 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Rashid Qadeer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Rashid Qadeer, brought a wages claim against the respondent, Mushtaq Ahmad. The respondent did not attend the hearing before Employment Judge C Lewis at East London Hearing Centre on 2 March 2020.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £720.00 forthwith.
The tribunal also imposed a separate financial penalty of £360.00 payable to the Secretary of State under section 12A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996. No other remedy was recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £720.00 forthwith. A separate financial penalty of £360.00 was ordered to the Secretary of State under section 12A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £720 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £720
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.