Case 3202537/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Yu v Federal-Mogul Controlled Power Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3202537/2021
- Decision date
- 26 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Members
- Panel members
- Mrs S Jeary, Mrs G Forrest
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr L Yu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at East London Hearing Centre before Employment Judge Moor with Mrs S Jeary and Mrs G Forrest, gave a unanimous judgment on 26 January 2023. It rejected Mr L Yu's direct and indirect age discrimination claims, his public interest disclosure detriment claims, his automatic unfair dismissal complaint, his section 44 health and safety action claim, his breach of contract complaint concerning the grievance, and his deduction of wages complaint.
By concession, the First Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant a net sum of £2,249.99, representing gross pay after deductions for tax and national insurance, in respect of outstanding but untaken holiday pay. No separate award was recorded for the dismissed claims, and the judgment does not set out any further remedy beyond the holiday pay payment.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Direct age discrimination claim failed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Age discrimination | Indirect age discrimination claim failed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Whistleblowing | Public interest disclosure detriment claims failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal complaint failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Section 44 health and safety action claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim concerning the grievance failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | By concession, the First Respondent was ordered to pay a net sum representing £2,249.99 of gross pay for outstanding but untaken holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £2,250 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.