Case 3202548/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Hingston v Clearspring Ready Homes Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202548/2019
- Decision date
- 5 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher JUDGMENT
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Hingston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 5 February 2021 at the East London Hearing Centre, Employment Judge Burgher struck out the claimant's complaints. The judgment records complaints of unfair dismissal, redundancy payment, notice pay, holiday pay, arrears of pay and other payments.
The reason given was that, by an order dated 14 January 2021, the Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the complaints should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Tribunal's orders dated 16 November 2019 and because they had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not comply with the further order to provide further particulars and did not make representations or request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the complaints. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out with the other complaints for failure to comply with Tribunal orders and failure to actively pursue the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment refers to a complaint of redundancy payment being struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to notice pay being struck out; mapped here as a contractual notice pay complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to a holiday pay complaint being struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to arrears of pay being struck out; mapped here as an unlawful deductions complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment also refers to 'other payments' being struck out, without further particulars. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.