Case 3202548/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Gabriella Henderson v Wishbone Publishing Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202548/2020
- Decision date
- 1 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge F McLaren Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Gabriella Henderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge F McLaren heard the case by telephone on 1 February 2021. The claimant, Gabriella Henderson, succeeded on her complaint that Wishbone Publishing Limited had made an unlawful deduction from wages in contravention of section 13.
The tribunal held that the deduction was well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £768.46, less PAYE as appropriate. The award was identified as unpaid holiday pay for 6.66 days accrued from 2 March 2020 to the termination date of 30 June 2020, using a daily rate of £115.38.
No other claims, remedies, or findings are recorded in the judgment text beyond the declaration that the section 13 complaint succeeded and the award for unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award was stated to be unpaid holiday pay for 6.66 days, calculated at a daily rate of £115.38 from 2 March to 30 June 2020, and payable less PAYE as appropriate. | Upheld | — | £768 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £768
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.