Case 3202593/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A C Smith v Mitie FM Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3202593/2021
- Decision date
- 10 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A C Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 16 September 2020, the tribunal gave Mr A C Smith an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out on the grounds that it had no reasonable prospect of success and had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary remedy was recorded, and the judgment was signed by Employment Judge Gardiner on 10 January 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not state the underlying pleaded claim type; this classification is taken from the gov.uk listing category. The claim was struck out after the claimant failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.