Case 3202604/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B O’Brien v Collins River Enterprises Limited (t/a Uber Boat by Thames Clippers) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202604/2020
- Decision date
- 10 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Knight Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B O’Brien
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr B O’Brien was unfairly dismissed by Collins River Enterprises Limited (t/a Uber Boat by Thames Clippers). The judgment records the decision on liability in one sentence and does not set out detailed findings on the factual background or the dismissal procedure in the extracted text provided.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr O’Brien £15,748.50. The judgment states that this was the total monetary award for unfair dismissal for the purposes of the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996.
The tribunal identified a prescribed element of £7,600.46 covering the period from 26 November 2020 to 9 March 2021. The amount by which the total monetary award exceeded the prescribed element was £8,148.04.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and ordered the respondent to pay £15,748.50. The judgment does not split the award between basic and compensatory elements. | Upheld | — | £15,749 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,749
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.