Case 3202606/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Burton v Everest Facilities Management Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202606/2019
- Decision date
- 16 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Burton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs J Burton presented the claim in person and Everest Facilities Management Ltd did not appear or have representation. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's wage was £2,121.26 net per month. It found that from 31 October 2017 the respondent had paid part wages for some months and made no payments for other months.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the total amount due to the claimant was £27,118.90 and ordered the respondent to pay that sum immediately. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages. It recorded the claimant's net monthly wage as £2,121.26 and calculated the total amount due from 31 October 2017 as £27,118.90. | Upheld | — | £27,119 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £27,119
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.