Case 3202608/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Sherman v East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202608/2019
- Decision date
- 11 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Sherman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal granted the respondent's application to extend time for presenting its Response under Rule 20. Applying Kwik Save v Swain, the judge accepted the explanation for the delay was not especially strong but found the balance of prejudice and the potential merits of the defence favoured allowing the Response.
On the claim itself, the tribunal found the claimant was summarily dismissed on 13 June 2019, so Early Conciliation needed to be started by 12 September 2019 if the unfair dismissal complaint was to remain within time. Early Conciliation was not started until 24 October 2019, and the ET1 was presented on 7 November 2019.
The tribunal considered whether it had jurisdiction because it was not reasonably practicable to bring the claim in time. It found that, despite low mood and stress, the claimant was able to pursue his dismissal and grievance appeals, prepare documents with and without union assistance, attend the appeal hearing, and seek and start alternative full-time work. The judge also held that any misunderstanding arising from union advice about exhausting internal appeals was not a sufficient legal excuse. The tribunal therefore concluded it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal complaint on its merits and dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint because it was presented outside the statutory time limit and the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction to determine the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Kwik Save v Swain [1997] ICR 49
- Section 111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable as reasonably feasible
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.