Case 3202615/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Childs v JVS Maintenance Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202615/2019
- Decision date
- 28 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Childs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre by Cloud Video Platform on 28 October 2020 before Employment Judge Burgher, with the Claimant appearing in person and the Respondent represented by its company director. The tribunal recorded that the Claimant’s claims for redundancy payment and notice payment succeeded.
Applying section 222 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal found the Claimant’s gross week’s pay to be £503.99 based on the last 12 weeks’ pay. On that basis, it calculated a redundancy payment of £9,827.81.
The tribunal also awarded 12 weeks’ notice pay in the sum of £6,067.88. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant a total of £15,875.69, being the combined value of the redundancy payment and notice payment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the Claimant’s redundancy payment claim succeeded and assessed a week’s pay at £503.99 gross under section 222 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £9,828 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the Claimant’s notice payment claim succeeded and awarded 12 weeks’ notice pay. | Upheld | — | £6,068 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,876
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 222 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.