Case 3202638/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Islam v London General Transport Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202638/2020
- Decision date
- 29 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reid Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z Islam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Claimant's claims were presented out of time. It also found that it had been reasonably practicable for him to present them in time.
On that basis, the Tribunal held that it could not hear the claims and dismissed them. The judgment states this applied to both the unfair dismissal claim and the notice pay claim, although the Claimant confirmed he had been paid notice pay in full and did not proceed with that claim in any event.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found the claim was presented out of time and that it was reasonably practicable for the Claimant to have presented it in time, so it could not hear the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment refers to a claim for notice pay. It states the time-limit finding applied to that claim too, although the Claimant confirmed he had been paid notice pay in full and did not proceed with that claim in any event. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.