Case 3202648/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Michael Barrett v B&Q Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202648/2019
- Decision date
- 10 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Allen QC
- Panel members
- Ms M Long, Mr O'Callaghan
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Michael Barrett
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed part time by B & Q Plc from 30 May 2019 and resigned by letter on 4 October 2019. B & Q Limited was added as a party. The tribunal dismissed the claim that he had not been paid for work on 30 and 31 May 2019, accepting that the respondent's monthly payroll mechanism treated those days as falling into the June payroll and that, over the relevant period, he had been paid for the months worked. It also found no failure to pay the national minimum wage.
The tribunal found that the claimant's resignation letter gave one month's notice, although it could have been clearer. It accepted that the respondent genuinely but unreasonably treated the resignation as immediate, and held that the claimant was entitled to Statutory Sick Pay for the certified sickness period from 2 October 2019 to 2 November 2019. The tribunal accepted the claimant's gov.uk calculation that he was entitled to seven days of SSP totalling £329.88.
On holiday pay, the tribunal held that the 50p per hour Hot Spot payment was part of normal remuneration and should have been included in accrued holiday pay on termination. It also rejected the deduction of seven holiday hours said to have been taken on 30 September 2019, finding that this made no sense on the evidence. The claimant should have received £614.85 in SSP and accrued holiday pay, and after sums already received and tax potentially recoverable, the respondent was ordered to pay £131.56.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for non-payment for work on 30 and 31 May 2019 failed; the tribunal also stated there was no breach of contract claim on this point. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for underpayment of accrued holiday entitlement on termination succeeded, but the final award was not split cleanly by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for underpayment of Statutory Sick Pay succeeded, but the final award was not split cleanly by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim relating to the national minimum wage failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claimant withdrew his claim relating to non-provision of payslips after being provided with paper copies. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £132
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.